Webreasonable explanation for the delay in making a valid application for review and that in any event he lacked prospects of success on review. [8] The applicant subsequently sought for leave to appeal to this Court under LC/MT/48/20. ... on the basis that the applicant’s intended grounds of appeal did not raise questions of law as required by ... WebThe applicants filed in this court on 12 March 2024 an application for review on two grounds. In the first ground, the applicants complained that the decision to discharge them from the Zimbabwe National Army (ZNA) was grossly irregular in that it was not made within the framework of the empowering law.
DISTRIBUTABLE ZIMBABWE ANTI CORRUPTION …
Webby reference to the main application for reviews. 11] The grounds of review are set out in the founding affidavit to the review application as follows: “19.1 The arbitrator misconducted himself by failing to take into account the evidence … WebSC 147/21. We take this view because the applicant’s grounds for review raise the sole contention that the court below grossly misdirected itself, at law and infact, in dismissing his application. He has identified the areas in question, although some of the grounds are in the nature of arguments. schedule k 1 form 1120 s codes 2020
Grounds for Review: The Garden Festival in Urban …
WebMr Dzvetero for the applicant motivated the application on three grounds. Firstly, he submitted that the application was, as a matter of fact, filed and served on the respondents within three days. He referred to the certificates of … WebThis is an application for review of the judgment of the magistrates court dismissing an application for discharge at the close of the case for the prosecution. The applicant is on trial in the magistrates court on thirty-two counts of bribery as defined in s 170 (1) (b) (ii) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. WebIn terms of the Labour Relations Act, there are three grounds upon which a Review may be launched. These grounds are as follows: 1. The Commissioner committed misconduct in relation to the duties of the Commissioner as an arbitrator; 2. The Commissioner committed a gross irregularity in the conduct the arbitration proceedings; 3. russia population gender ratio